“Investing should be dull. It shouldn’t be exciting. Investing should be more like watching paint dry or watching grass grow. If you want excitement, take $800 and go to Las Vegas.”‘
Paul Samuelson, Nobel laureate in economics.
I wrote last month that the best investment choices for most people are stock index funds/ETF’s. Trying to beat the market by picking individual stocks is extremely difficult and not worth the trouble for most ordinary investors. However, this does not mean that it is impossible. If you are intellectually curious, looking for a new hobby, and willing to spend some time on research, trying your hand at stock picking can be a worthwhile endeavor.
In my opinion, the key to having ANY chance at success at beating the market is having some type of investment thesis. What is your information advantage that would enable you to pick which company’s stock will be successful better than the analysts and mutual fund managers on Wall Street who price the securities? Be honest with yourself. Stocks are priced the way they are for a reason. Unless you work in the industry, talk to management regularly, or receive illegal insider tips, the chances of you discovering some amazing bargain that everyone else missed is slim to none.
So what advantage do you have? One very important one: a long-term time horizon. Unlike big mutual fund managers, you don’t have to worry about beating the S&P 500 quarterly, or yearly. Mutual fund managers are often forced to sell when the market is cheap (shareholders pull out money), and must buy when the market rises. You don’t. With the freedom to ignore these short-term market gyrations, you can invest based on certain long-term principles that have been established over the last 100 years. This does not mean that they are guaranteed to continue, but the past is all we have to go on. A few of these principles:
1. Stocks outperform bonds.
2. Dividend-paying stocks outperform non-dividend payers
3. Stocks with a rising dividend outperform those with a stagnant dividend
4. Over time, reinvested dividends account for the majority of the stock market’s gains
One of the major benefits of dividend growth stocks is that the yield on your initial investment increases every year. If you bought Coca-Cola in 1988 with Warren Buffett, you would now have a 30% yield on your initial investment, in addition to tremendous capital appreciation. If you invest $1000 today in a 4% yielder that increases its dividend by 10% a year, in eight years the yield on your initial investment will be about 9%. In twenty years, the yield increases to almost 30%. In thirty-three years, you will get your entire initial investment back every year. Even if the stock’s price does not increase at all, you are doing far better than keeping your money in bonds at 2% or savings accounts at even less. Factor in even modest capital appreciation, and we can start to see the incredible power of dividends.
There is one large caveat: it is important to choose companies that will be able to continue to pay their dividends over many years, in good economic times and bad. The 2008 financial crisis led to many companies cutting dividends that were previously thought to be safe. To avoid unnecessary dividend risk, I recommend avoiding the financial, tech and retail sectors for use in this particular strategy. I think these industries are inherently more volatile and prone to disruption by new competitors. While I have faith that Coca-Cola will be dominant in its industry and paying large dividends in ten (or twenty) years, I cannot say the same about Microsoft or even Wal-Mart.
Here is a list of a few high-quality, dividend-paying companies to start your research. Most of them appear to be cheap today based on historical valuations. Remember to diversify and not overweight any one sector too heavily:
McDonald’s, Sysco, Pepsi, Coca-Cola, Procter and Gamble, Kimberly Clark, Automatic Data Processing, Paychex, 3M, General Electric, Emerson Electric, Dupont, Conoco Phillips, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Abbott Labs, Johnson and Johnson, AT&T, Verizon, United Parcel Service, Exelon, Con Edison
Some people will take a look at these stocks and think that they are suitable only for retirees or others who are extremely risk-averse. Nonsense. What these critics really mean is that these stocks are boring, and won’t make you rich overnight. Over the long run, low P/E, dividend-raising stocks like these have outperformed their riskier high P/E cousins, with much less volatility. This is what is known as a free lunch. Take advantage of it.
by Johnny Utah






